Showing posts with label Pakistan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pakistan. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Remains of The Day

While Zardari's PPP has had a very hard time convincing the people of Pakistan on the governance front, the Sharif brothers have woken up from their stupor to mend their bastion, Says Saurabh Kumar Shahi

Sometime during early last week a confident looking aspirant from a religion-based political party in Pakistan walked with a swagger into the office of the Electoral Returning Officer (RO) in order to face a small interview, and then the result, that would have confirmed whether or not was he eligible to contest the upcoming Parliamentary elections; something that is enshrined in the Article 31 and 62 of the constitution. He clearly expected a couple of questions on his qualification  and probably a tap on the wrist before he is approved. The RO instead asked him to say the 6th Kalima, which he promptly failed to recite. The zero-sum nature of the entire exercise notwithstanding, the incident says a lot about what we should expect in the coming elections. Whatever be the outcome, the 2013 Elections in Pakistan will be known for uneasy alliances and sheer hypocrisy of the main players.

Let's look at the prospects of the major players. The ruling Pakistan People's Party (PPP) can always claim that it managed to take the country through its most tumultuous period unscathed. That it became the first democratically elected government in Pakistan to complete its tenure is indeed an achievement. But it is also the sum total of its achievements. It has pretty little to show  on other fronts.

However, PPP does command a total domination over its traditional Sindhi, Sareiki, poor, downtrodden and minority votes. In fact, in spite of its failure to save minorities from persecution during its tenure, it is basically a foregone conclusion that it will bag the majority of minority votes that are extremely relevant in eight out of 13 districts in Sindh and two districts in Punjab. It has also taken the battle right into the Punjabi heartlands of Nawaz Sharif's PML (N) by winning several seats in the by-polls. However, its governance has at best been pathetic. That is going to take a toll on its vote-bank, especially outside Sindh. The only cushion as of now appears to be the much touted Benazir Income Support Program (BISP).

“Even though Pakistan is now ranked as one of the most corrupt countries in the world, the BISP has avoided egregious waste and has mostly succeeded in reaching the intended targets. If the PPP does well in the May elections, it will be largely because of the success of this programme. "One of its main features was the empowerment of very poor women,” maintains Shahid Javed Burki, who has served variously as a caretaker finance minister and as a vice-president at the World Bank.

On the other hand, Nawaz Sharif and his PML (N) is visibly and evidently buoyant about their prospects. Punjab is Pakistan's most populous province and hence has 148 out of 272 seats up for grab. It is here that Nawaz Sharif wants to achieve the critical mass to come up as the single largest party. Nawaz Sharif's hold is primarily among the Punjabi conservative trading-class and his policies as Prime Minister have always been pro-development and pro-market. In fact, it can be safely said that from the world class Lahore-Islamabad-Peshawar motorways to the newly constructed Lahore Rapid Bus System, most of Pakistan's modern infrastructure has been the brainchild of PML (N). In sharp contrast, PPP's five years were marred by power, water, fuel and several other shortages.

Also, Nawaz has tweaked his constituency's traditional conservatism to suit his party's manifesto. So, while he is pretty comfortable doing tacit understanding with openly anti-Shia outfits such as  Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, in tune with his rabid anti-Shia constituency in Southern Punjab; he has also made it clear that he will improve relationship with India and will take it to a new level. But he has a Pathan size problem in the form of Imran Khan.

When Imran Khan started his so-called Tsunami, his primary target were youth voters who account for close to 40 percent of the total electorate in these elections. Among the youths, he primarily targeted the urban kinds mostly concentrated in cities like Karachi, Lahore, Rawalpindi, Hyderabad and Bahawalpur. However, he soon realised that it will be close to impossible to make a mark in Karachi or Hyderabad that are too polarized on ethnic lines. So his obvious next target was Punjab. And that spelled trouble for PML (N). The historic Lahore rally by Khan did manage to put the world's focus on him and his party. However, since Khan and Murphy's Theory are so synonymous, no one was surprised when he and his party peaked prematurely and lost steam thereafter. Meanwhile the visibly rattled Nawaz and his Chief Minister brother Shahbaz were shaken from their stupor and actually started mobilizing the cadres. In fact, many believe, and rightly so, that it was the threat perception from Imran Khan that helped complete the Lahore Rapid Bus System in record time. As this story goes to print, Nawaz appears to have gained a substantial part of his lost territory. But  another territory of his looks threatened too.

The Southern part of Punjab and Bahawalpur have always had a distinct culture from the more prosperous and progressive Northern Punjab. The discrimination in the allocation of funds and general neglect has turned Southern Punjab into a festering wound of ethnic-religious bigotry. The demand for a separate province is old. But it was only last year that the PPP government dangled them the carrot and actually organized a committee to look into the possibility. In complete contrast of how things operate in our part of world, the committee quickly did the survey and presented a final report, which was promptly adopted. Now PPP is hopeful that it will help them make strong inroads in the Southern Punjab region.

It will not be PPP and PML (N) alone who will battle for Southern Punjab seats. In the last year or so, Khan's PTI inducted some of the stalwarts from Southern Punjab in his party fold including ex-Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi, Rao Qaiser and Cheema brothers. Although there is no visible wave for his party there but each of the above mentioned names and others can bring in a couple of seats.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….
IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global
Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman

ExecutiveMBA

Saturday, June 1, 2013

Nothing official about it

Pakistan will not leave any chance at extracting mileage as the recent trip of outgoing Prime Minister Raja Parvez Ashraf's trip to Ajmer demonstrated. Syed Khurram Raza looks at the larger picture

What steps will Pakistan not take to make a point when conducting its relations with India? Traditional diplomacy, track two meetings and sporting exchanges. Now add to it, dargah diplomacy.

When news that Pakistan's outgoing Prime Minister Raja Parvez Ashraf wanted to visit Ajmer Sharif, it did not make sense immediately. He was, after all, demitting office in a few days and could not in any way make an impact on Indo-Pakistan ties which have been under strain since the beheading of two Indian soldiers on the Line of Control (LoC) in January this year.

There was considerable confusion about the status of the visit until New Delhi decided to treat it as a private one. That clearly did not suit Islamabad which has spared no effort to politicise any event that can get it global mileage.

So when it comes to diplomacy, Pakistan is quick to exploit every situation, be it sports or religion. General Zia Ul Haq in 1987, President General Pervez Musharraf in 2004 and Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani in 2011 used cricket to improve relations with India - or more appropriately used it as an occasion to play to the international gallery.

While cricket diplomacy is Pakistan's most-favoured way of communication, in the last one year, both their President and Prime Minister have come on private visits to India, ostensibly to pay obeisance to the Gharib Nawaz at Ajmer Sharif. Ajmer Sharif remains among the holiest of shrines for Muslims in south Asia and a place of worship which attracts a large number of believers from all faiths. The folk lore here -  as with other prominent pilgrim places -  believes that a visitor can only go there you are called.


The question people are asking is this: is it yet another Pakistani strand of diplomacy where even the world famous dargah is fair game? How does Pakistan balance open defiance of India by lavishly hosting India's most wanted, Dawood Ibrahim and Saeed Hafeez and other perpetuators of serious terror attacks in the last couple of decades, with emotional trips to the Ajmer Dargah?

Says Mohammed Maroof Khan, principal of New Delhi's Zakir Hussain Memorial School, ``This is sheer hypocrisy and goes against the teachings of the Gharib Nawaz. I do not believe that Pakistani politicians go to Ajmer only to pay obeisance, it is not much different from watching cricket matches, as in the past.''

According to sources, Pakistan wanted to buy some space but it did not suit India. ``First, the atmosphere in our country is sensitive about the beheading of Indian soldiers and second, since President Raja Pervez Ashraf is in office for just another week, he is not in a position to take any decision. Hence the Indian response has been tepid – other than a lunch thrown in his honour by Foreign Minister Salman Khurshid in Jaipur, '' he says. Officials interpret Raja's move as the following: Pakistan was testing out the waters to see if India was willing to hold talks after the recent bad blood. They wanted an invitation without asking for it!  The Indian government gave a very clear message that they would not bite. It is evident in the representation of officials who went to Jaipur. The highest-level Indian officer present there was the Director, Pakistan Desk at the MEA. Surely things would have been different if either Ashraf had more time in office or it was Zardari or Nawaz Sharif on a dargah visit.

Little wonder, that the tenor of the lunch invitation was anything but diplomatic. Those present said the Indian Foreign Minister talked at length on Sufism, Sufi music, Abida Parveen and the Rajasthan culture - but there was nothing official about the meeting.


In diplomacy, every small nuance tells a tale: Salman Khurshid, for instance, did not wait for Raja Ashraf to return from Ajmer and left for Delhi immediately after lunch. So India down played the whole visit and made it a strictly private affair where the visiting Pakistani VIP was accompanied by close family members. Islamabad's desperate efforts to salvage something official from the trip remained thwarted.

But as can be expected, in an Indo-Pakistan drama, politics could not be too far away from the surface. There was resistance to the visit by some Khuddams who guide devotees in paying homage at the pilgrimage.  Says Deewan Zainul Abeidin, who publicly opposed the Pakistani's Prime Minister's visit. ``I am the descendant of Khawaja Gharib Nawaz and as you know, he was the messenger of peace in this region. I cannot welcome the head of a state which does not observe the teachings of Gharib Nawaz. The head of state of a country which claims to be an Islamic Republic and does not follow the teachings of Islam and Prophet Mohammad should not be welcomed. Basically they have defamed Islam and it is because of them that Muslims are seen with suspicion.”


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
2012 : DNA National B-School Survey 2012
Ranked 1st in International Exposure (ahead of all the IIMs)
Ranked 6th Overall

Zee Business Best B-School Survey 2012
Prof. Arindam Chaudhuri’s Session at IMA Indore
IIPM IN FINANCIAL TIMES, UK. FEATURE OF THE WEEK
IIPM strong hold on Placement : 10000 Students Placed in last 5 year
BBA Management Education

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Manufacturing Consent

Documents suggest that in the years leading to 9/11, Taliban was not only willing to hand over Bin Laden to the US but also warned the latter of an impending terrorist attack
 

US administration documents acquired through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and released by Washington based National Security Archive shed some additional light on talks with the Taliban preceding the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. It also underlines the constant Taliban offer to hand over Osama bin Laden; and the activity of Pakistan before and after the attacks.

As present-day US plan of action increasingly follows policies to conciliate or “flip” the Taliban, the document highlights Washington’s complete refusal to negotiate with Taliban immediately after 9/11. For example, on September 13, 2001, the then US Ambassador to Pakistan Wendy Chamberlin brusquely told President Pervez Musharraf that there was “absolutely no inclination in Washington to enter into a dialogue with the Taliban” and that the time for dialogue was “finished as of September 11.” However, Pakistan’s approach was more holistic and did not correspond to the American knee-jerk reaction. The then ISI chief N Mahmoud Ahmed told the ambassador not to act in anger. The real victory, he said, would come in negotiations and that if the Taliban were eliminated, Afghanistan would “revert to warlordism.” There are some interesting inputs on Osama as well. When asked about apprehending Laden, Mahmoud said it was “better for the Afghans to do it. We could avoid the fallout.” He in fact travelled to Afghanistan twice, on September 17, aboard an American plane, and again on September 24, 2001 to talk over the gravity of situation with Taliban leader Mullah Omar. However, the US was hell bent on action. Chamberlin categorically let Mahmoud known that while his meetings were all right, but they “could not delay military planning.”

Subsequent papers underscore the value of the bilateral bond to leaders in both Pakistan and the US. An interesting memo categorized seven demands handed over to Mahmoud by US Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage just 48 hours after the attack. President Musharraf sent a cable a day after accepting all the demands “unconditionally”. However, the documents also reveal fundamental disagreements and distrust vis-a-vis Taliban.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPMMalay Chaudhuri
and Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist).

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

BUMBLING IN THE BACKYARD

The governments of Pakistan, China, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan and Bangladesh reveal to akram hoque of B&E...

We all know that the Chinese have an interesting proverb used as a subtle and sarcastic barb against foes: “May you live in interesting times”. Now just imagine for a while that Winston Churchill - the man who wanted India forever to be the crown jewel of the British Empire - was entertaining uncharitable thoughts when it was clear to him that the crown jewel would indeed be lost forever in a tidal wave of anti-Imperialism. Did he possibly utter the following words when he thought grimly about Jawaharlal Nehru and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, the architects of the modern Indian nation state: “May you live with interesting neighbours?”. There might be endless debates and controversies when we use other adjectives to describe India’s neighbours. But surely everyone will agree that China, Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Myanmar and Sri Lanka are quite ‘interesting’, if nothing else! In fact, they - and their relationship with India - has been so interesting over the last six decades that it remains the single biggest foreign policy challenge for the country!

Surely Jawaharlal Nehru would not have had thought even in his wildest dreams (or nightmares) back in 1947 that India would face such enormous, enervating and enfeebling challenges while dealing with neighbours in the 21st century? Bangladesh then was not even a figment of imagination.

Pakistan was hostile no doubt; but jihad was something that had happened many centuries ago in West Asia. Nepal was the only Hindu Kingdom in the world with extremely close - almost umbilical - ties with India. Sri Lanka was on the cusp of attaining freedom and emerging as a South Asian paradise where the Sinhalese and Tamils co-existed in harmony. Burma was a free country where tens of thousands of Indians flourished. And yes, China was to be the friend, ally and partner of India as the Third World nations worked as comrades in arms against ‘Imperial forces’.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012. An Initiative of IIPMMalay Chaudhuri
and Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist).

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.
 
Zee Business Best B-School Survey 2012
Prof. Arindam Chaudhuri’s Session at IMA Indore
IIPM IN FINANCIAL TIMES, UK. FEATURE OF THE WEEK
IIPM strong hold on Placement : 10000 Students Placed in last 5 year
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….

IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global

Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman
IIPM B-School Facebook Page
IIPM Global Exposure
IIPM Best B School India
IIPM B-School Detail

IIPM Links  
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face