Showing posts with label Business and economy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Business and economy. Show all posts

Monday, May 6, 2013

The marriage of a “virtuous mouse” and a “wealthy elephant”

Professors James E. Austin and Herman B. “Dutch” Leonard, of Harvard Business School discuss whether the marriage of a “virtuous mouse” and a “wealthy elephant” work to the benefit of both

Q: How can elephants protect the mouse’s value & brand integrity?

JA/DL: The more effective large companies have recognised that preserving the social icon’s distinctive culture and business approach is essential to preserving its key success factors. Consequently, they retain a large degree of organisational independence so as to prevent “contamination” of the social technology. This stands in contrast to the common approach in acquisitions to integrate and rationalise the assets into the new owner’s systems, structure, and culture. Some of the specific mechanisms used in successful small company-big comapny M&A deals include governance structures and processes that give the “mice” review and even veto power over actions by the “elephants” that might jeopardise those elements that are deemed essential to the social values underlying the brand’s integrity.

Q: What are some obstacles that companies considering these kinds of acquisition strategies need to be mindful of?

JA/DL: Avoid assuming that these acquisitions are the same as others. Failing to understand and appreciate the social value dimension of the mice’s missions or failing to respect their distinctive operating culture can create incompatibility and conflict that will probably cancel the courting or sour the marriage. Don’t look first for cost rationalisations, but concentrate on the top line growth.

Q: So, do such M&A deals create value for shareholders?

JA/DL: The marriages we have studies so far are still in their early stages, so we will need to continue observing how they unfold. Nonetheless, the emerging evidence suggests that both the virtuous mice and the wealthy elephants are well on their way to attaining their respective goals. Scaling is occurring, thereby enabling social entrepreneurs to achieve greater impact. Market penetration and positive financial results are being achieved, thereby meeting the large companies’ aspirations. There have been bumps, but it does appear that the partners are capable of learning and adjusting, and are well on their way to capturing the potential synergies.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
2012 : DNA National B-School Survey 2012
Ranked 1st in International Exposure (ahead of all the IIMs)
Ranked 6th Overall

Zee Business Best B-School Survey 2012
Prof. Arindam Chaudhuri’s Session at IMA Indore
IIPM IN FINANCIAL TIMES, UK. FEATURE OF THE WEEK
IIPM strong hold on Placement : 10000 Students Placed in last 5 year
BBA Management Education

Friday, May 3, 2013

The high risks of short-term management

Profs. Francois Brochet and George Serafeim of Harvard Business School, in a HBS Working Knowledge interview with Sean Silverthorne, Editor-in-Chief, HBSWK, talk about their new research findings that prove how management based on short-term goals have negative implications for both investors and company executives alike

Companies that manage for short-term gain rather than long-term growth have been blamed for everything from popularising celebrity CEOs to causing a significant chunk of the current financial crisis. New research findings suggest that short-termism might have negative effects on these companies themselves and their investors. There’s another surprise in the research: short-termism might not be as widespread as we think, and a substantial number of corporations are rising to the challenge. “One important takeaway is that firms with long-term horizons exist,” says George Serafeim, Asst. Professor at Harvard Business School, coauthor of the working paper ‘Short-termism, Investor Clientele, and Firm Risk’, with HBS doctoral candidate Maria Loumioti and Assistant Professor Francois Brochet. “Many companies are being managed for the long term,” says Serafeim.

The research team was interested in several issues: Do short-term companies attract a particular kind of investor? Is investing in these firms riskier than investing in companies with longer-term time horizons?

Their first order of business was to determine a method for categorising companies on the short-term/long-term continuum. The answer came in the very words used by executives to discuss their companies. Brochet, Serafeim, and Loumioti studied transcripts of 70,042 earnings calls where executives discuss quarterly results with investors, analysts, and the media that were held by 3,613 firms during 2002-2008. This involved searching for 14 terms used by management such as “latter half” and “weeks” that would tip off a short-term view, versus 15 words or phrases such as “long term” and “years” that would suggest a longer time horizon approach.

The researchers then compared their list of companies on both ends of the spectrum with the companies’ actual financial and stock performance, studying indicators such as return volatility, the length of time investors held a firm’s stock, and the cost of capital. The results showed that short-term companies attracted short-term investors (bringing with them a whole new set of performance pressures on executives) and that the financial and strategic performance of these companies was more volatile – and riskier – than that of the long-termers. The team also identified industries that appear to be short-term-oriented (banking, electronic equipment, business services, and wholesale) and long-term-focused (beverages, retail, pharma, and medical goods). Companies, too, were categorised by outlook. Short-termers included Cisco, Goldman Sachs, and Chevron, while the longer horizon outfits included Coca-Cola, Ford, and Nordstrom.

Question: In general, what relationship did you find between companies you identified as short-term-oriented, their investors, and the behaviour of their stocks? 
Francois Brochet (FB): Overall, we found a positive association between the horizon over which firms communicate and the investment horizon of their shareholders. In addition, short-term-oriented firms appear to have more volatile stock returns and higher estimated cost of equity capital – that is, greater risk. While the presence of long-term-oriented investors appears to mitigate the positive association between firms’ short horizon and the volatility of their stock, this does not apply to the association between short-termism and cost of capital. We interpret this as evidence that our short-termism measure captures a dimension of non-diversifiable risk in the economy.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
 
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles

Thursday, May 2, 2013

Penn State pedophilia scandal: Lessons for CEOs

CEOs may argue that cover-ups protect their companies’ interests. An HBS Working Knowledge column on why these arguments may be totally invalid

The most damaging portion of former FBI Director Louis Freeh’s report on the Pennsylvania State pedophilia scandal is his conclusion that four senior university officials concealed football coach Jerry Sandusky’s child abuse from 1998 to 2011, even from its board of trustees, because they wanted “to avoid the consequences of bad publicity”.

In so doing, these officials – including legendary head football coach Joe Paterno and President Graham Spanier – placed their own reputations ahead of the harm that Sandusky did to young boys for the next 14 years.

Ironically, had Penn State turned Sandusky over to legal authorities in 1998, the public would have viewed its actions as protecting the victims, thereby enhancing the University’s reputation. Instead, these men caused grave damage to a great university while allowing Sandusky free reign to destroy lives. Sadly, the Penn State situation is not unique. Consider these other cases:

Had President Richard Nixon acknowledged his role in the Watergate scandals, he could have saved his presidency and his legacy. Had the hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church acknowledged its pedophilia scandals, it would have protected victims and its moral authority. Had President Bill Clinton admitted his relationship with Monica Lewinsky, the scandal would have subsided, enabling him to focus on his pro-growth policies to balance the budget and create jobs. Had Martha Stewart and Rajat Gupta admitted their roles in insider trading, they could have plea bargained, moved past their ethical lapses, and possibly avoided prison time. Had Best Buy founder Richard Schulze not covered up CEO Brian Dunn’s improprieties, he could have retained Best Buy’s reputation for sound values (and his own).

Contrast these actions with JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, who took immediate responsibility for his firm’s recent trading losses, calling them “stupid and egregious”. While Dimon took considerable heat, his reputation as a “truth teller” remains intact. Eventually, JPMorgan will be restored and corrective actions put in place to mitigate future risks.

The deeper question raised by these examples is – what causes leaders to cover up inappropriate actions instead of acknowledging them immediately?

Many leaders strive for such perfection that they are unwilling to admit mistakes. They feel tremendous external pressure to be perfect, but in reality they are far more successful when they are authentic. Were they to think rationally about what to do, they would see it is better to acknowledge the truth, no matter how painful, because the truth will surface eventually. More importantly, they can prevent further harm to the victims. While leaders may rationalise that a cover-up protects the interests of their organisations, the damage of one typically harms their institutions far more than the direct admission of a mistake.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
 
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
 

Friday, April 26, 2013

Damn globalisation!

If you are one of those who sits back over a cup of coffee, marvels at India’s growth & takes all pessimism with a pinch of salt; this is a book you can’t miss. It’s a rich account of where we stand & where we’re headed

When I read ‘Confessions of an Economic Hitman’ a few years back, I was shocked to know that the US government has such extensive involvement in private corporations, which further its objective of global dominance. What I understood from the book was that underdeveloped or developing economies with vast amounts of natural resources were exploited by the US, which did so by embroiling them in a debt trap. However, as I sat through Aseem Shrivastava’s and Ashish Kothari’s Churning The Earth – The making of global India, I realised that global politics has moved much beyond and globalisation is now a grand scheme through which powerful nations wish to achieve global dominance. Shiravastava (an economist) and Kothari (an environmentalist) weave an intricate and comprehensive account of the social and environmental changes that have brought about unprecedented development (or so it seems) in India over the last two decades, at a horrible cost. In summary, the book is about India’s unbelievable growth story, why it is a sham and how millions of people suffer everyday at the cost of a few elites ending up better off. The writers have managed to assimilate a great deal of data to substantiate their arguments. For instance, to prove that the increase in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has done more harm than good, the authors use the Government of India’s Economic Survey – data which is easily available in the public domain. As per statistics churned out by the survey, India managed to finance its investment from domestic sources between 2002 to 2008 because domestic savings equalled domestic investments. This implies that FDI worth $120 billion during this period generated massive returns for investors without adding any new productive capacity. The more important question is what was all this money used for? It piled up in the form of RBI’s dollar reserves, which were in turn used to finance surplus imports. In short, India was tricked into spending beyond her means even when she could have done without it.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
 


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
 

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Barack Obama’s Kony capitalism

Ugandan Joseph Kony’s past is reason enough to target him as a crime perpetrator; but the grand involvement of United States in such a myopic issue clearly seems to be only with an objective to capture oil resources in the Ugandan region than for any other altruistic reasons

Joseph Kony. By some accounts, he’s a raving lunatic. By other accounts, he’s purely a cult religious fanatic. By almost all independent and reliable accounts, the man is a cut-down-to-size erstwhile extremist on the run who might previously have had fair resources under his command, engineering random killings, ethnic cleansing and abductions not only in Uganda – his former homebase from where he used to lead the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) – but also in South Sudan, Congo and Central African Republic. But by no sane account is the man currently worth the title of a global terrorist.

Of course, two decades ago, Kony was a different man, with a larger-than-life persona, commandeering armed men under the LRA umbrella ostensibly fighting for “freedom”. But over the years, the LRA – which sources claim had above of 100,000 fighters during the 1990s, including a significant number of children – has been decimated quite impressively by Ugandan forces. As of date, some estimates mention that the LRA – if it at all exists anymore as an entity – couldn’t have more than a hundred so-called fighters, and those too operating discretely without any central command. And the reason for that is that Kony’s been on the run for quite a long time; and his motley LRA crew – which Uganda strongly claims is being ‘supported’ by Sudan – wouldn’t even have been known in countries outside Africa had the US not decided to get in their spin doctors into the act and brand Mr. Kony as the new Osama bin Laden.

In other words, Kony – who is often now referred to even as a plain vagabond criminal – is not worth betting your grandmother’s Edward shilling on. Far lesser is he worth creating a Lord’s Resistance Army Disarmament and Northern Uganda Recovery Act (which Mr. Obama created in May 2010) or demanding more funding from Congress primarily to target Kony and his coterie (which the US President again did in November 2010) or sending “combat-equipped” US defence forces into Uganda with a prime objective to remove Kony and destroy LRA (which Mr. Obama again managed in October 2011). And to top it all, the spin doctors even released a Youtube video called Kony 2012 in March 2012 (it’s been viewed more than 100 million times on Youtube and Vimeo as this magazine goes to print). The video documents Kony and LRA’s various ‘atrocities’ and demands action.

The gaumless ridiculousness of Mr. Obama’s so-called altruistic moves got highlighted to worse levels when on March 21, 2012, the US Senate passed a resolution against “the ruthless guerrilla group” and backed efforts to target Kony and LRA. Seriously, is all of this for a man who has, as per the US government’s own admission (Donald Yamamoto from the US State Department revealed the figures), just 150 fighters left? Kony had been operating for decades and the US did nothing. Then why now, when Kony is already almost extinct?


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
 
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
 

Friday, April 19, 2013

“Linux doesn’t have an ideology... and I don’t think it should”

With a 61% market share of the global servers market, and running 75% of stock exchanges worldwide, the Linux operating system today powers the servers that delivers Amazon, Facebook, Twitter, Ebay and Google. Linus Benedict Torvalds, the Helsinki-Born creator of the OS, speaks out his mind on the merits of open source, open collaboration software systems

Q: In 1991 you were a student at the University of Helsinki and a self-taught hacker. What got you thinking about creating a new Operating System?
Linus Torvalds (LT):
It wasn’t really a conscious decision; it was more a confluence of factors. Part of it was simply that I was interested in Operating Systems and had been working on low-level issues for a long time. I’d been doing assembly language programming and messing around with device drivers with my previous machine – a Sinclair QL that had very little support in Finland. So although I was only 21, I had something of a background for it. Another thing was that I wanted to run Unix on my newly-acquired PC, so rather than running DOS and Windows, I had gotten Minix for my machine, which was a small Unix-like OS built for educational purposes. But it was much more limited than the Unix I had gotten used to at university. At the same time, I was working on a ‘pet project’ to teach myself all about the innards of my new machine. This is what ended up expanding to become the first version of Linux.

Q: Linux doesn’t seem to have an ideology – or does it?
LT:
Linux doesn’t have an ideology, no, and I don’t think it should. The important part of the question is the word ‘an’; I do think there can be many ideologies: I do it for my own reasons, other people do it for their own reasons. It’s really refreshing to see people working on Linux because they believe they can make the world a better place by spreading technology and making it available to people more widely. That’s one ideology, and I think it’s a great one. It isn’t really why I started Linux myself, but it warms my heart to see it used that way. But I also think it’s great to see all the commercial companies that use open source simply because it’s good for business. That’s a totally different ideology, and I think it’s a perfectly good one, too. The only ideology I really despise is the kind that is about exclusion of other ideologies. That’s just small minded and stupid. So the important part about open source is not the ideology – it’s just that everybody can use it for their needs and reasons.

Q: Before long, you began to encourage input to your system’s coding from other members of the IT community. Given how hard you worked on it, how did feel about the ‘loss of control’?
LT:
To me, inviting other people to become part of the project wasn’t about me losing control; it was about getting lots of new ideas for further improvements. I would almost certainly have become bored with Linux rather quickly if it hadn’t been for this decision – that’s what had happened with the earlier projects I worked on in private. In fact, the initial impetus for making the Linux source code available publicly was not because I wanted others to help me write it – it was because I was proud of what I had done and wanted feedback on where to go next. The early interactions were less about other people writing code, and more about asking others what they thought the project needed, and then me writing the code myself. When people started actually sending me suggested code changes, that became a very natural extension of it.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
 

Monday, April 15, 2013

The agony & hope for India’s domestic airlines: call it ‘FDI’

B&E analyses the outcome of allowing foreign carriers to invest in India’s domestic airlines. Finally some good news, many presume. The reality is actually quite the opposite.
 

If North American carriers have set standards of growth over the years, so have airlines in India. Only difference is – for India’s domestic industry, growth has always come in a package of losses. And over the years, despite optimism galore, all we can discuss aloud are the canyons of losses which have been etched into their financial books. Exaggerated? Turn the clock back to 2006, when airlines around the world returned to their profit-making ways after half-a-decade-long patch of drought. Since then (leading up to FY2010), global airlines have recorded profits amounting to $18.70 billion. [This is despite the $25.90 billion in losses they suffered during downturn-struck 2008 & 2009.] Of this, North American carriers contributed $5.7 billion. The Indian carriers on the other hand, have been living on a prayer. Despite a 48.83% jump in total passengers carried (domestic & international; to touch 64,522,662 in FY2010-11), a 64% increase in the number of operational airports (to 82), and a 158.13% jump in fleet size, their losses have only escalated. During a five year period, when global airlines made billions, India’s domestic carriers lost $5.43 billion.

To make more sense of how our domestic carriers are stuck between the devil and the deep sea, here is a forecast from IATA. Given the recovery in the industry since 2009, airlines globally, after returning a record $18 billion in FY2010, are scheduled to record $6.9 billion in profits in FY2011. Even better, all the broad geographies are expected to make money. Carriers in North America will make $1.5 billion, Europe: $1.4 billion, Asia-Pacific: $2.5 billion, Middle East: $0.8 billion, Latin America: $0.6 billion & Africa: $0.1 billion. And India? A negative $3.0 billion in FY2011 (forecast by CAPA). Shocking.

The carnage on Indian airstrips for years now, has been visible from miles away. Woebegone tales of the big three – Air India (AI), Kingfisher (KFA) and Jet Airways (Jet) – requiring urgent cash infusion have become a daily back-fence talk in the aviation circles. [A fast fact: since FY1997-98 the big three have recorded losses and debt to the tune of $3.186 trillion – roughly three times India’s GDP in FY2010.] So have strikes by pilots and other staff, winding up of operational arms to reduce losses, and problems with ATF prices and taxes levied on it by various States (ATF currently contributes to 40% of the cost-base of Indian carriers, much higher a proportion as compared to global standards – in 2010, total fuel bill globally, amounted to $176 billion, which was 30% of industry costs, as per IATA). That the big domestic airlines got into a mode of unceremonious self-slaughter by trying to outdo each other played against them. The stifling environment did the rest.

So what is the Ministry of Civil Aviation’s (MoCA) last resort to keep the industry afloat, especially the big three? Attract investments by foreign carriers through the FDI route – MoCA suggests the limit should be 24%, while the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) recommends that it should be anywhere between 26% to 49%. A piece of smile-winning news after long it seems. But will this prove manna to the ailing Indian carriers?


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
 
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
 
2012 : DNA National B-School Survey 2012
Ranked 1st in International Exposure (ahead of all the IIMs)
Ranked 6th Overall

Zee Business Best B-School Survey 2012
Prof. Arindam Chaudhuri’s Session at IMA Indore
IIPM IN FINANCIAL TIMES, UK. FEATURE OF THE WEEK
IIPM strong hold on Placement : 10000 Students Placed in last 5 year
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….
IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global
Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman
IIPM B-School Facebook Page
IIPM Global Exposure
IIPM Best B School India
IIPM B-School Detail

IIPM Links
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face

Moving towards ‘Mobile 2.0’

B&E: With the latest initiative of brand integration under Tata DoCoMo, what is it that you want to achieve?
Deepak Gulati (DG):
The world of telecom is changing from pure voice to a lot of data, which includes browsing and e-mailing, applications, content and solutions for customers to do things beyond simple telephony. Tata DoCoMo is strategically moving towards ‘Mobile 2.0’. Secondly, the move will ensure the upgradation of Tata Indicom to Tata DoCoMo. It’s a logical thing to put your every offering under one brand. Spreading your media spends or confusing customers with multiple brands from the same organisation, doesn’t really make sense. Tata Indicom customer will get all the benefits like per second tariff plans, et al. But it’s not about pricing, it’s how we treat our customers. And it is the customer feedback that we look forward to.

B&E: Any change in organisational structure and job cuts due to the new restructuring?
DG:
Our stores have become larger, all of them now being Tata DoCoMo stores, offering the entire set of services that we have across all platforms. As of now we have multiple platforms which we can leverage beautifully under one brand. Brands have nothing to do with jobs, so no cutting on jobs. We are now integrating and unifying across all our 4-5 brands. We have also integrated the operations. Now, it is all in one website, one store, one customer care centre.

B&E: Will there be different verticals for CDMA and GSM customers?
DG:
The verticals are based on consumer solutions. If it is home solutions, there will be a vertical to offer products based on needs and product construct, which can be on various platforms and not necessarily CDMA, GSM or 3G. The product what the customer needs is important. Everything is integrated.

B&E: You have recently lost almost 2.6 million customers in the month of June-July. What was the reason?
DG:
We are in the cleaning mode — shedding customers who don’t use our services beyond 6 months. But we have some additions on the CDMA side. Currently, out of our 90.1 million subscribers 40-50% are of Tata Indicom (CDMA) network.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
 
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
 
2012 : DNA National B-School Survey 2012
Ranked 1st in International Exposure (ahead of all the IIMs)
Ranked 6th Overall

Zee Business Best B-School Survey 2012
Prof. Arindam Chaudhuri’s Session at IMA Indore
IIPM IN FINANCIAL TIMES, UK. FEATURE OF THE WEEK
IIPM strong hold on Placement : 10000 Students Placed in last 5 year
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….
IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global
Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman
IIPM B-School Facebook Page
IIPM Global Exposure
IIPM Best B School India
IIPM B-School Detail

IIPM Links
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face

Friday, April 12, 2013

The Truth behind America’s Population Growth Agenda

Started by The US Administration and Promoted by Economists The World over, Population growth Programs became one of The Most Vital aspects of Developments in The 21st Century. Much to The Dismay of Governments, The Plans have actually backfired...

I have spent more than forty years of my professional life telling economists, business people, academics, politicians, government officials and the public at large that population growth can be one of the most positive factor in the attainment of long-term sustainable human development. My advocacy of a culture of life was actually prompted by the scientific studies of one of my professors in the doctoral program in economics at Harvard in the early 1960s, the famous Nobel laureate Simon Kuznets. As the father of national income accounting and a notable economic historian, he showed through empirical research that population growth was a major stimulus in the industrial revolution and economic growth that happened in the more advanced economies during the 19th century and the first half of the 20th century. With data pertaining to almost a century of economic development, he convinced us (his students) and many of his colleagues in the economics department of Harvard that there was no truth to the Malthusian theory of development and that population growth was a very positive contributor to long-term economic growth.

This experience at Harvard greatly influenced the way I taught my first course on Economic Development in the LIA-COM program of De Salle University. During the second half of the 1960s, I had some of the most brilliant undergraduate students at DLSU then. I presented the empirical evidences of Simon Kuznets and other economists and economic historians about the positive dimensions of population growth. I think I was able to convince a good number of them that birth control – an issue already being discussed in countries like India and China then was not a solution to the problem of mass poverty. I presented the same case in favor of population growth to my students in the Economics 11 course at the University of the Philippines in the late 1960s and early 1970s.

Not too long after that, the debate on population control started to heat up. First, there was the best-seller of Paul Ehrlich and his wife who were both resource economists in the US, entitled “The Population Bomb”. It resuscitated the much-discredited Malthusian theory that the world will run out of resources if the population continues to grow and that there could be widespread famine. A good number of leaders in the developing world believed the Ehrlichs. In India and China, there were government-sponsored programs of population control, many of them extremely coercive. Forced sterilizations were common in India. In fact, such programs were responsible for the eventual downfall of Indira Gandhi and her clan. Under the communist regime of Mao Zedong, the Chinese citizens had no alternative but to kowtow to the one-child policy. In the first years of his Presidency, Ferdinand Marcos had a very pro-life attitude. After reading the Humanae Vitae, he used to quote in public speeches a phrase lifted from the Encyclical, “we will not limit the number of participants in the banquet of life.”


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
 
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
 

Monday, April 1, 2013

Continental and United – A Marriage Gone Wrong?

Jeff Smisek is a Turnaround Guy. He did that to Continental. But The Merger of United-Continental is Proving a Tougher “Trench Warfare” to win. Will The Fight for “Survival” end up as a Slugfest gone Wrong?

Talk of regrets. Not with Jeffery Smisek, the CEO of the $8.43 billion worth United Continental Holdings. An economics major from Princeton University, he was on the run to get a Ph.D at MIT. He dropped out and joined a bank in New York instead. After working for two years there, he joined Harvard Law School in 1979. Main reason? He wanted to be near his girlfriend Diana Strassmann, who was then studying in the Economics department at Harvard. Three years later, romance got the better of him again. With no employer’s card in his pocket, he decided to follow Diana to Houston (who had joined the Economics faculty at Rice University). Many advised him against doing so, but it turned out to be a good choice. The Harvardian soon found his fair share of luck in the corporate law market. Over the years that followed, Smisek became a successful M&A and Securities lawyer. But it was not until the summer of 1995 that Smisek’s career took the right course. A friend helped set up an appointment with Gordon Bethune, the-then CEO of Continental Airlines in May that year. The airline was in a mess – financial & operational – and Smisek had hoped to win a client account. To be fair, Bethune turned out to be a better salesman. He convinced Smisek to quit his cushy ‘Partner’ position in the famous Vinson & Elkins law firm and join the struggle of existence at Continental as the Senior VP & General Counsel. Again, many suggested that it sounded too risky – why leave the ground and leap into a dry well? But for Smisek, to play Captain America to Continental was not difficult a choice to make. He was a believer. He was the one who had once got lucky in love – running after Diana & winning her hand for marriage. 16 years later, he finds himself as the CEO overseeing yet another marriage – that between Continental & United Airlines. Only this time, chances of this marriage working out is slim.

Slim? Yes. Agreed that the $3 billion merger (closed on October 1, 2010) between US’ 4th & 5th-largest airlines (United & Continental resp.), has created the world’s largest airline by revenues and the 3rd largest by fleet count (707 as of April 30, 2011; after Lufthansa’s 746 & Delta’s 744). Even its topline of $32.72 billion for FY2010 was the highest for any airline globally. But size alone guarantees nothing. Beneath the hubris, even Smisek can sense a closet full of troubles. And it comes in the name of bleeding bottomlines. During the past two years, when US carriers made a combined $3.7 billion in profits, the two partners lost a total of $1.27 billion (United – $1.17 billion and Continental - $107 million). There is also the problem of falling footfalls. During the 12 months leading to January 2011, the combined passenger count for the two parties saw a y-o-y net reduction of 4.77%. The situation assumes an alarming status when seen in the light of absolute numbers. While the combined entity witnessed a fall of 3.69 million in passenger count, others like the #2 Delta & the #3 Southwest saw their numbers rising by 32.49 million (growth of 56.46%) & 5.04 million (growth of 4.94%) respectively. So, with all balloons being burst in the name of size, suddenly, the leader’s hat seems to have caught fire. Smisek is aware of it. He had walked into a similar situation 16 years back. That time, he had saved the ship. This time, the sea is rougher. Is Titanic being retold?


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
and Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist). For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

“The Indian Luxury Car market will be The Second largest for Volvo in Asia by 2020”

Volvo has been a slow Mover in India so far, Unlike Rivals like Mercedes-Benz, BMW and Audi who have Sprinted ahead and Grabbed The Volumes. Goran Larsson, President – Asia, Volvo Cars weighs in on his Company’s Growth plans in The Country in Discussion with Pawan Chabra

B&E: Volvo has not been as aggressive in the luxury car segment in India as BMW or Mercedes. Where does India stand in the scheme of Volvo’s global operations?

Goran Larsson (GL):
India is a very strategic market for Volvo and we have been operating in this country for many years now. We have been learning our way to walk in this market before we start running. The way the Indian luxury car market is growing, we expect it to become the second-largest in Asia after China by 2020. If you see, we have launched two globally acclaimed products XC60 and S60 in a span of six months, which is a clear indication that the company is getting more serious about the Indian market. As far as competition is concerned, they do what they feel is right but we follow our own way. There are companies in India which sell over a million vehicles in a year. We don’t but we have a very loyal customer base that is very much convinced about the quality and safety of Volvo cars. We have intentions of becoming a bigger player in this market as well and we will become a bigger player in India.

B&E: As you mentioned, with the recently launched S60, Volvo has already marked its presence in the segment that attracts huge volumes. What are your expectations from the S60?
GL:
The D segment is undoubtedly a large and profitable segment in the Indian market and the scenario is similar in the rest of the markets in Asia as well. With the launch of S60, we have two sedans in this segment. Keeping in mind the price, design, features and quality of the car, I would be very surprised if it is not able to attract a huge demand in the Indian market. Most important, we have the capacity to meet the demand of the Indian market and we can adjust the production pipeline accordingly. Out motive is to maintain profitable growth and we are not looking at market leadership because it is of no importance becoming a leader when you are making no money.

B&E: Volvo has so far been known as the maker of the safest cars in the world but the company has of late been emphasising a lot on the design and other features as well. How has it worked for the company?
GL:
We initially started to work on attractive designs back in the 1980s. But you are right that the process has been streamlined only recently. We have already bid adieu to the boxy designs and have realised that making the safest cars and promoting them as vehicles that are high on safety will not alone attract a lot of buyers. Our focus is now to package the vehicles as well as the other features. This may not prove to be rationally important but it is certainly emotionally important to the consumer. However, we will continue to build on the USP of manufacturing the safest cars in the world.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
and Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist).

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

B&E Indicators

Global aerospace & defence perspective
US continues to be the largest spender on aerospace & defence in the world, bigger than the top 15 defence-spending nations put together. Incidentally, US is also the most advanced nation in terms of R&D activity as well as the market structure. However, experts now see the emerging economies such as India and China coming up the curve in aerospace & defence spending in the near future.

R&D remains critical
R&D remains critical to the sustainability of this sector as no other sector is more strongly linked to the government spending of a country than this. Countries such as Russia & US spend big amounts on defence-related R&D every year. In fact, a closer look at the US R&D spend in aerospace, defence & national security over the past few years indicates that almost $11 billion is estimated to be spent in 2011, which is about 46% of the total global R&D spend projected in the same year.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
and Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist).

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles

Monday, March 18, 2013

“We are Among Top Two Players in Seven Circles”

Rajat Mukarji, Chief Corporate Affairs Officer, Idea Cellular in an Exclusive Talk

The Indian telecom industry has been a benchmark in the way it has made mobile services available to the common man. But then, the task has not been easy for most of the players. Cut-throat competition has not only hit the profitability of most of the players, but has also questioned the survival of many. However, Idea Cellular is one that has stood the test of the time and is the only player to have made it to this year’s edition of B&E’s Fastest Growing Companies in India. So what made it click? Rajat Mukarji, Chief Corporate Affairs Officer, Idea Cellular reveals the secret:


B&E: Idea has been amongst India’s top 5 telecom companies for quite sometime now. What is the recipe for your success?
Rajat Mukarji (RM):
Our customer focused quality service approach has been the key for our success in the highly competitive telecom segment. A customer while selecting for an operator primarily keeps three things in mind – network coverage, brand value and quality of service. Idea, in a short span of time, has achieved all three and become a vibrant brand known for its dynamic value added services (VAS).

B&E: When are you planning to roll out 3G services in the circles where you have won licences? How is Idea Cellular’s strategy different from other 3G service providers?
RM:
We have one of the highest number of 3G licences in the country. Out of the total 22 telecom circles in the country, we have licences in 11 circles and have paid Rs.57.7 billion as licence fees. Having presence in half the telecom circles will definitely benefit us, as none of the players have pan India 3G licence. This certainly gives us an edge over the competitors. Further, we have a ready-to-3G network and as such we are planning to launch 3G services by Q1 FY2012. Moreover, Idea will continue to focus on its innovative VAS offerings and services at competitive price. A special focus would be on launching the 3G services in rural India as 40% of the subscriber base lives there.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
and Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist).

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles